Home
SwitchTool
About us
Resources
Global
United States
198.3
GW
1005
MT
Coal plants in
United States
Additional profit over 30 years
553.7
Bn. $
% Profitable
94
%
Annual CO2 emissions saved
1005
MT / year
Total W-S-B investment need
475.1
Bn. $
Investment Potential
21
n.a.
%
of this country’s annual energy-related CO2 emissions could be eliminated by SwitchCoal.
Investment breakdown
475.1
Bn. $
Initial Investment for Conversion to Wind and Solar Power Plant
553.7
Bn. $
Additional profit from switch over 30 years (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
Solar
215,439
M. $
Wind
265,154
M. $
Battery
23,722
M. $
Production costs
5.2
ct/kWh
Mean OPEX of the coal plants within this country (Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2022)
3.5
ct/kWh
Production cost of renewable energy
Dive deeper into the data
0
Regions
0
Power plants
Sort by
CO2 emissions saved (high-low)
CO2 emissions saved (low-high)
Total W-S-B inv. need (high-low)
Total W-S-B inv. need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Region
CO2 emissions saved
Total W-S-B inv. need
% Profitable plants
Indiana
CO2 emissions saved
78.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
37.9
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
West Virginia
CO2 emissions saved
63.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
34.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Kentucky
CO2 emissions saved
57.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
29.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Pennsylvania
CO2 emissions saved
52.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
26.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Missouri
CO2 emissions saved
51.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
22.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
North Carolina
CO2 emissions saved
47.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
23.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Texas
CO2 emissions saved
42.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
50
%
Ohio
CO2 emissions saved
42.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
22.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Illinois
CO2 emissions saved
36.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.0
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Wyoming
CO2 emissions saved
35.1
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
13.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Michigan
CO2 emissions saved
34.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
18.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Tennessee
CO2 emissions saved
34.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
17.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Florida
CO2 emissions saved
32.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
16.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Georgia
CO2 emissions saved
30.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
15.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Wisconsin
CO2 emissions saved
27.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
12.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
South Carolina
CO2 emissions saved
27.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
15.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Arkansas
CO2 emissions saved
27.1
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
11.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Iowa
CO2 emissions saved
26.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Kansas
CO2 emissions saved
25.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Alabama
CO2 emissions saved
25.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
12.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Utah
CO2 emissions saved
24.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Colorado
CO2 emissions saved
24.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
10.9
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Minnesota
CO2 emissions saved
22.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
9.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Nebraska
CO2 emissions saved
20.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
7.8
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Oklahoma
CO2 emissions saved
18.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
7.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Louisiana
CO2 emissions saved
15.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
7.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Arizona
CO2 emissions saved
12.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
4.9
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
75
%
Maryland
CO2 emissions saved
10.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
5.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
North Dakota
CO2 emissions saved
9.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.5
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
33
%
Montana
CO2 emissions saved
8.8
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Virginia
CO2 emissions saved
8.5
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
4.6
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
67
%
New Mexico
CO2 emissions saved
8.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
3.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Mississippi
CO2 emissions saved
5.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.4
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
50
%
Nevada
CO2 emissions saved
4.6
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.3
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Washington
CO2 emissions saved
3.7
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
2.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
New Hampshire
CO2 emissions saved
3.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.7
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Puerto Rico
CO2 emissions saved
3.0
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Delaware
CO2 emissions saved
2.4
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.2
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
South Dakota
CO2 emissions saved
2.3
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
1.0
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Alaska
CO2 emissions saved
0.2
MT/y
Total W-S-B inv. need
0.1
Bn. $
% Profitable plants
100
%
Load more
Sort by
CO2 emissions (high-low)
CO2 emissions (low-high)
Investment need (high-low)
Investment need (low-high)
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Plant
CO2 emissions
Investment need
Profitable?
Plant Bowen
CO2 emissions
16.9
MT/y
Investment need
9.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gibson Generating Station
CO2 emissions
16.5
MT/y
Investment need
8.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Monroe Power Plant
CO2 emissions
16.0
MT/y
Investment need
8.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Miller Steam Plant
CO2 emissions
14.4
MT/y
Investment need
6.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Amos Plant
CO2 emissions
14.3
MT/y
Investment need
8.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Scherer Steam Generating Station
CO2 emissions
13.8
MT/y
Investment need
6.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Roxboro Steam Plant
CO2 emissions
13.1
MT/y
Investment need
6.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Rockport Plant
CO2 emissions
12.8
MT/y
Investment need
5.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Cumberland Steam Plant
CO2 emissions
12.6
MT/y
Investment need
6.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gavin Power Plant
CO2 emissions
12.6
MT/y
Investment need
7.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sherburne County Plant
CO2 emissions
12.6
MT/y
Investment need
4.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jim Bridger Steam Plant
CO2 emissions
12.5
MT/y
Investment need
4.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Labadie power station
CO2 emissions
12.2
MT/y
Investment need
5.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Martin Lake Steam Station
CO2 emissions
12.0
MT/y
Investment need
5.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Cross Generating Station
CO2 emissions
11.2
MT/y
Investment need
6.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Ghent Generating Station
CO2 emissions
11.2
MT/y
Investment need
5.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Parish Generating Station
CO2 emissions
11.2
MT/y
Investment need
4.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Jeffrey Energy Center
CO2 emissions
11.1
MT/y
Investment need
4.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Belews Creek Steam Station
CO2 emissions
10.6
MT/y
Investment need
4.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Marshall Steam Station
CO2 emissions
10.2
MT/y
Investment need
5.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Kingston Fossil Plant
CO2 emissions
10.0
MT/y
Investment need
5.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Limestone Generating Station
CO2 emissions
10.0
MT/y
Investment need
4.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Harrison power station
CO2 emissions
9.9
MT/y
Investment need
5.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Homer City Generating Station
CO2 emissions
9.9
MT/y
Investment need
5.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Petersburg Generating Station
CO2 emissions
9.4
MT/y
Investment need
4.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Cardinal Plant
CO2 emissions
9.2
MT/y
Investment need
4.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Conemaugh Generating Station
CO2 emissions
9.2
MT/y
Investment need
4.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Independence Steam Station
CO2 emissions
9.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Keystone Generating Station
CO2 emissions
9.2
MT/y
Investment need
4.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Powerton Generating Station
CO2 emissions
9.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
White Bluff Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
9.2
MT/y
Investment need
4.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Shawnee Fossil Plant
CO2 emissions
9.0
MT/y
Investment need
4.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Fayette Power Project
CO2 emissions
8.9
MT/y
Investment need
3.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Mill Creek Station
CO2 emissions
8.8
MT/y
Investment need
4.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Springerville power station
CO2 emissions
8.8
MT/y
Investment need
3.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Laramie River Station
CO2 emissions
8.7
MT/y
Investment need
3.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Montour Steam Station
CO2 emissions
8.5
MT/y
Investment need
4.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Mount Storm power station
CO2 emissions
8.4
MT/y
Investment need
4.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sammis Plant
CO2 emissions
8.4
MT/y
Investment need
4.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Intermountain power station
CO2 emissions
8.2
MT/y
Investment need
4.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Oak Grove Plant
CO2 emissions
8.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Brunner Island power station
CO2 emissions
8.1
MT/y
Investment need
4.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Campbell Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
8.1
MT/y
Investment need
4.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Hunter Power Plant
CO2 emissions
8.1
MT/y
Investment need
3.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Spurlock power station
CO2 emissions
8.1
MT/y
Investment need
4.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Colstrip Steam Plant
CO2 emissions
8.0
MT/y
Investment need
3.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Comanche power station
CO2 emissions
8.0
MT/y
Investment need
3.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Four Corners Steam Plant
CO2 emissions
8.0
MT/y
Investment need
3.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Mitchell Plant
CO2 emissions
8.0
MT/y
Investment need
4.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
La Cygne Generating Station
CO2 emissions
7.9
MT/y
Investment need
3.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Clifty Creek Station
CO2 emissions
7.8
MT/y
Investment need
4.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Craig Station
CO2 emissions
7.7
MT/y
Investment need
3.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Iatan Generating Station
CO2 emissions
7.7
MT/y
Investment need
3.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Walter Scott Jr. power station
CO2 emissions
7.7
MT/y
Investment need
3.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Crystal River Energy Complex
CO2 emissions
7.6
MT/y
Investment need
3.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Prairie State Energy Campus
CO2 emissions
7.6
MT/y
Investment need
3.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Seminole Generating Station
CO2 emissions
7.4
MT/y
Investment need
4.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Belle River Power Plant
CO2 emissions
7.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Big Bend Station
CO2 emissions
7.2
MT/y
Investment need
3.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Brandon Shores Generating Station
CO2 emissions
7.0
MT/y
Investment need
3.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gerald Gentleman Station
CO2 emissions
7.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
James E. Rogers Energy Complex
CO2 emissions
7.0
MT/y
Investment need
3.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
J. K. Spruce Station
CO2 emissions
6.9
MT/y
Investment need
3.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
South Oak Creek Plant
CO2 emissions
6.9
MT/y
Investment need
3.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Gallatin Fossil Plant
CO2 emissions
6.8
MT/y
Investment need
3.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Winyah Generating Station
CO2 emissions
6.8
MT/y
Investment need
4.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Big Cajun II Power Plant
CO2 emissions
6.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Coal Creek Station
CO2 emissions
6.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Kincaid Generating Station
CO2 emissions
6.6
MT/y
Investment need
3.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Nebraska City Station
CO2 emissions
6.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
New Madrid Power Plant
CO2 emissions
6.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Pleasants power station
CO2 emissions
6.6
MT/y
Investment need
3.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Kyger Creek Station
CO2 emissions
6.5
MT/y
Investment need
3.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Trimble County power station
CO2 emissions
6.5
MT/y
Investment need
3.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Baldwin Energy Station
CO2 emissions
6.4
MT/y
Investment need
3.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Rush Island power station
CO2 emissions
6.4
MT/y
Investment need
2.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Thomas Hill Energy Center
CO2 emissions
6.4
MT/y
Investment need
2.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Mountaineer Plant
CO2 emissions
6.3
MT/y
Investment need
3.5
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Brame Energy power station
CO2 emissions
6.1
MT/y
Investment need
3.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Elm Road power station
CO2 emissions
6.1
MT/y
Investment need
3.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Barry Steam Plant
CO2 emissions
6.0
MT/y
Investment need
3.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Harrington Station
CO2 emissions
6.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sooner Generating Station
CO2 emissions
5.8
MT/y
Investment need
2.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Tolk Station
CO2 emissions
5.8
MT/y
Investment need
2.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Welsh Power Plant
CO2 emissions
5.8
MT/y
Investment need
2.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Columbia Energy Center
CO2 emissions
5.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.6
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Fort Martin power station
CO2 emissions
5.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Miami Fort Station
CO2 emissions
5.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.9
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Chesterfield power station
CO2 emissions
5.5
MT/y
Investment need
3.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Cayuga Generating Station
CO2 emissions
5.4
MT/y
Investment need
2.3
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Merom Generating Station
CO2 emissions
5.4
MT/y
Investment need
2.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Sioux Power Plant
CO2 emissions
5.4
MT/y
Investment need
2.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Huntington Power Plant
CO2 emissions
5.3
MT/y
Investment need
2.1
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Antelope Valley Station
CO2 emissions
5.0
MT/y
Investment need
1.8
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Daniel Generating Plant
CO2 emissions
5.0
MT/y
Investment need
2.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Boswell Energy Center
CO2 emissions
4.9
MT/y
Investment need
2.2
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Dave Johnston Power Plant
CO2 emissions
4.8
MT/y
Investment need
2.0
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Warrick Power Plant
CO2 emissions
4.8
MT/y
Investment need
2.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Bull Run Fossil Plant
CO2 emissions
4.6
MT/y
Investment need
2.4
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Coronado Generating Station
CO2 emissions
4.6
MT/y
Investment need
1.7
Bn. $
Profitable?
Yes
No
Next
Load more
Location view
Get insights for a country or region
Country
Region
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zimbabwe
Zambia
Vietnam
Uzbekistan
United States
Ukraine
United Kingdom
Türkiye
Thailand
Tajikistan
Taiwan
Sri Lanka
Spain
South Korea
South Africa
Slovenia
Slovakia
Serbia
Senegal
Russia
Romania
Panama
Poland
Philippines
Pakistan
North Macedonia
North Korea
Nigeria
New Zealand
Netherlands
Namibia
Myanmar
Morocco
Montenegro
Mexico
Mongolia
Mauritius
Malaysia
Madagascar
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Kosovo
Kazakhstan
Japan
Italy
Israel
Ireland
Iran
Indonesia
India
Hungary
Hong Kong
Guatemala
Honduras
Guadeloupe
Greece
Germany
France
Finland
Brunei
Dominican Republic
Denmark
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
China
Chile
Cambodia
Canada
Bulgaria
Brazil
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Australia
Argentina
Bangladesh
Cannot find a country? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Zonguldak
Zhejiang
Zhambyl
Yunlin
Zachodnio-Pomorskie
Zabaykalsky Krai
Yunnan
Yilan
Yalova
Xinjiang
Wyoming
Wisconsin
Wielkopolskie
Western Visayas
Western Australia
Western Macedonia
West Virginia
West Sumatra
West Nusa Tenggara
West Pomerania
West Java
West Kalimantan
West Bengal
Washington
Waikato
Vidin
Victoria
Virginia
Veneto
Valparaíso Region
Vâlcea
Uusimaa
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
Ustecky
Ústí nad Labem
Utah
Ulaanbaatar
Ulsan
Tula
Trenčín
Tra Vinh
Tomsk
Toamasina
Tohoku
Tianjin
Thanh Hoa
Thai Nguyen
Thai Binh
Tennessee
Texas
Tashkent
Telangana
Tarnow
Taoyuan
Tamil Nadu
Taipei
Tainan
Taichung
Syddanmark
Świętokrzyskie
Suchitepequez
Sverdlovsk
Stara Zagora
Southern District
South Chungcheong
Southeast Sulawesi
Southern
South Sumatra
South Kalimantan
South Sulawesi
South Pyongan
South Jeolla
South Holland
South Dakota
South Gyeongsang
South Carolina
Souss-Massa
Soc Trang
Soccsksarden
Smolyan
Sliven
Şırnak
Śląskie
Sivas
Sindh
Sihanoukville
Shandong
Shikoku
Sichuan
Shanghai
Shanxi
Shan
Shaanxi
Selangor
Schleswig-Holstein
Savinja
Saxony
Saxony-Anhalt
Savanne
Next
Cannot find a region? This means it was not analyzed as part of the SwitchCoal study.
Load more
